Purpose Of The First Personality Tests

7 Mar, 2024
Purpose Of The First Personality Tests

The first personality test emerged as a crucial tool to identify soldiers at risk of psychological breakdown during World War I. It carried the weight of life-and-death decisions on the battlefield. Its initial aim to preserve mental resilience in wartime set a precedent for personality assessment that influences our understanding of human behavior to this day. Let's dive deeper into the origins of this influential system.

Are You Ready?
Take this test and find out your type.

The Genesis of Personality Testing

It all started in the grueling backdrop of World War I, where the clamor of conflict spurred the birth of a new psychological tool – the personality test. A certain Charles Myers, intrigued by the ravaged minds of soldiers, played a pivotal role in crafting this novel approach to understanding human behavior.

This was a time when the need to comprehend the human condition was not just academic but a matter of life and death. The horrific realities of the war demanded a system to evaluate the resilience and psychological strength of combatants, marking the advent of personality testing.

The origins of these tests, born amidst the turmoil of war, found fertile ground in the realms of clinical and quantitative psychology. This period saw personality tests evolve from rudimentary wartime tools to intricate psychological assessment resources, designed to probe the depths of human personality and behavior.

The early work of Charles Myers in constructing objective personality tests has had a lasting impact, setting the stage for an industry that sought to measure personality traits with scientific rigor.

Relevant Articles: Can You Trust Personality Tests

Most Common Personality Type Male

Leaders Who Changed The World And Their DiSC Style

The Shell Shock Solution: Assessing Soldier Trauma

In the heat of battle, a new challenge emerged: identifying those susceptible to shell shock, the psychological scourge of the trenches now known as PTSD. Step forward the Woodworth Personal Data Sheet, a psychological assessment resource devised with this very purpose in mind. It was the brainchild of psychologist Robert S. Woodworth, a simple yet groundbreaking tool consisting of a series of yes-or-no questions that covered everything from medical to social history.

The test, designed for rapid administration at medical officer training camps, laid the groundwork for contemporary psychological evaluations. High scores on this early test were a red flag, prompting further evaluation by a psychologist. Despite its limited use during the war, it established a foundation for structured self-report questionnaires, which would later become a staple in military and clinical contexts. The Woodworth Personal Data Sheet did more than just assess soldiers; it paved the way for a revolution in psychological evaluations.

From Clinical Psychology to Workplace Application

The transition from the clinic to the cubicle was as transformative as it was unexpected. Personality tests, originally designed for psychological testing to diagnose mental illnesses, began to infiltrate the business world, with industrial psychologists championing their use in the recruitment process.

These tests were viewed as a remedy for industrial discord, enabling the weeding out of troublemakers and dissidents. This approach was a vestige of the scientific management trends of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which advocated for the application of empirical methods to human resources.

Eventually, the scope of personality tests widened from merely eliminating the undesirable to actively seeking an ideal match. The Humm-Wadsworth Temperament Scale and the Bernreuter Personality Inventory were among the first to evaluate employee temperament and personality traits, marking the early integration of these assessments into the workplace.

From ensuring employee ‘adjustment’ to predicting job performance and satisfaction, personality tests became standard in many organizations, helping to identify behavioral patterns that indicated suitability for specific roles.

Read more: Meanest Personality Type

Can You Spot DiSC In Your Favorite Films

Decoding the Human Psyche: Early Personality Assessment Measures

Alt Text

The humble beginnings of personality testing in the trenches led to the creation of tools that would shape the future of psychological assessment. The Woodworth Personal Data Sheet stood as the cornerstone upon which subsequent personality inventories and questionnaires were built. However, the early days of personality test development were marred by the subjective biases of their creators, which often reflected their own personality characteristics rather than objective measures. These early tests were the first attempts to construct a map of the human psyche, albeit one that was often skewed by the cartographer’s own perspective.

Despite these drawbacks, early personality assessment methods marked a significant advancement in our understanding of both normal and abnormal personality. They laid the groundwork for a more empirical personality assessment, which would eventually lead to the development of structured personality tests that we recognize today.

From these initial, somewhat rudimentary attempts, a more nuanced and empirically derived personality assessment industry would emerge, seeking to decode the complex tapestry of human personality with ever-increasing precision through the use of empirically derived personality assessments.

Evolution of Purpose: Beyond the First Tests

Alt Text

As the years marched on, personality tests evolved, expanding their reach and refining their accuracy. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, for instance, represented a quantum leap in the objective personality test construction, making it a staple for diagnosing mental illnesses. However, it wasn’t just about the clinical application; enter the Big Five Personality Test, a behemoth in the realm of personality assessment instruments with its 60 questions designed to measure five major dimensions of personality.

These dimensions – openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism – were not just fancy terms but had real-world implications, predicting life outcomes and even economic impacts. Interestingly, the same personality test could yield different results for an individual over time, showcasing the dynamic nature of human personalities.

The Big Five represented more than just a new test; it embodied the evolving objectives of personality assessments. Personality tests had transcended beyond their initial clinical applications, becoming tools to illuminate aspects of the human condition that had far-reaching consequences.

Their role expanded beyond mere diagnosis and prevention to encompass understanding and prediction. The Big Five represented a maturation of personality testing, one that held the promise of unlocking the secrets of human behavior in ways that the early pioneers could scarcely have imagined.

Learn more: Big Five Vs. DiSC

Can My Employer Force Me To Take A Personality Test

The Impact of Theoretical Advances on Testing

The winds of change brought about by the theoretical advances in psychology swept through the personality testing landscape with the introduction of the Five Factor Model.

This empirical personality trait model proposed a new way of assessing human personality, earning wide acceptance among psychologists and spurring personality test development. The Five Factor Model, with its roots in the lexical paradigm, garnered substantial empirical support, demonstrating its applicability across various psychological disciplines and frameworks.

This model wasn’t just a tool for understanding the normal personality sphere; it was instrumental in aligning personality disorder models in major diagnostic manuals, providing a structured approach to understanding maladaptive traits. By measuring where individuals stand on the spectrum of traits like:

  • Extroversion
  • Emotional stability
  • Openness to experience
  • Agreeableness
  • Conscientiousness

The Five Factor Model became a beacon for predicting job performance and satisfaction, a true testament to the impact of theoretical advances on the construction of personality tests.

Personality Tests Today: A Multifaceted Tool

Fast forward to today, and personality tests have morphed into a Swiss Army knife of psychological assessment tools. Their applications are as varied as the personalities they measure – from personal development to team building and everything in between.

Self-report inventories are the norm, allowing individuals to reflect and rate their agreement with various statements to pinpoint stable personality traits. In personal development, these tests are not just about self-discovery; they’re catalysts for growth, often paired with coaching or training to spark actionable insights.

In therapeutic contexts, personality tests initiate discussions, facilitating the careful and precise navigation of individual personality complexities. Some of today’s questions echo those of the Woodworth Personal Data Sheet, showing a continuity and evolution in the tools we use to understand ourselves. Tests like the Birkman Method delve deep into the realms of motivation, self-perception, and social perception, offering a comprehensive understanding of the individual that goes beyond simple categorization.

Alternatives to Traditional Personality Tests

As useful as traditional personality tests have been, they are not without their limitations, prompting the search for alternatives that could offer a more holistic view of an individual’s suitability for a job role. Some alternatives to traditional personality tests include:

  • Role-related assessments
  • Practical work samples
  • Construct actual performance tests
  • Actual objective performance tests
  • Skills assessments from platforms like Vervoe

These alternatives provide a richer, performance-based perspective of a candidate’s capabilities and offer a more objective and job-related measure of their abilities. Additionally, AI grading systems can help scale hiring efforts.

Behavioral interview queries and efficient onboarding processes serve as practical substitutes for conventional personality tests, focusing on past behaviors and potential future actions, all while fostering inclusivity and cultural diversity within teams. The shift from seeking ‘culture fit’ to valuing ‘culture add’ represents a paradigm shift in hiring, emphasizing the importance of diverse perspectives and supporting the use of varied evaluation methods.

This evolution signifies a move from conceptually driven assessments to data-driven and technological methods, such as AI-powered tools, which mark a new chapter in the evaluation of candidate suitability.

The Debate on Test Validity and Reliability

Yet, in the midst of their widespread use, personality tests have been ensnared in a web of controversy, particularly regarding their reliability and validity. The question looms: can these tests truly capture the complexities of human personality, or do they falter under the weight of subjectivity and bias?

Critics argue that personality tests, with their susceptibility to manipulation and the inherent challenge of self-assessment, may not provide an accurate reflection of an individual’s character. Furthermore, the ethical implications of using such tests for critical decisions like hiring, especially without solid scientific backing, cannot be ignored.

The looming presence of confirmation bias and the subjectivity of scoring methods in some personality assessments have only increased doubts about their efficacy. As personality tests traverse different cultures and contexts, the risk of biases and inaccuracies looms large, challenging the very foundations upon which these tests are built.

The debate on test validity and reliability is a reminder that, while personality tests are powerful tools, they are not infallible and must be used with caution and a critical eye.

How Modern Hiring Practices Utilize Personality Testing

In the realm of recruitment, personality tests have carved out a niche as indispensable tools for evaluating interpersonal skills, team dynamics, and cultural fit. They serve as a lens through which employers can glimpse a candidate’s social prowess and emotional intelligence – qualities imperative for certain roles.

By shedding light on how individuals might respond to work-related pressures, personality tests provide valuable insights into a candidate’s potential to thrive within an organization’s culture.

Yet, their usage is not without contention. The integration of cognitive assessments seeks to complement personality tests by evaluating reasoning and problem-solving skills, aiming to reduce bias and enhance the selection of qualified candidates. However, this blend of cognitive and personality testing introduces its own set of challenges, with concerns about discrimination and ethical implications taking center stage. It is argued that while these tests can predict job performance, they also risk perpetuating biases, necessitating their use as one of multiple instruments in the recruitment arsenal.

The future of hiring is not just about data; it’s about the harmonious integration of technology, intuition, and a diverse array of assessment tools, including innovations like gamified evaluations that enrich the candidate experience.

The Future of Personality Assessment in Professional Contexts

Looking ahead to the future of personality assessment, it’s apparent that AI and machine learning technologies will take center stage, all while paying homage to the tried-and-true methods of the past. The promise is to generate new assessment items, personalize insights, and measure context-specific traits with unprecedented precision. An integrated and adaptive approach to personality testing will consider a combination of cognitive abilities, motivations, and values, leveraging machine learning for nuanced adaptation and employing AI for sophisticated trait measurement.

As AI becomes more entrenched in personality assessment, the challenges of maintaining transparency, fairness, and bias-free processes take on new urgency. The future of personality testing will not forsake its traditional roots; instead, it will aim to blend the best of both worlds, balancing the depth of traditional methods with the efficiency and innovation of AI and machine learning enhancements.


Drawing the curtains on our exploration, it’s clear that personality tests have come a long way from their inception in the trenches of World War I. They’ve evolved from simple tools to assess soldier trauma to sophisticated instruments that shed light on our deepest drives and potential.

Today, they serve a myriad of functions, from personal growth to shaping the future of work. And as we look ahead, the integration of AI promises to unlock even more insights into the human psyche. The key takeaway? Personality tests are not just reflections of who we are but also beacons guiding us toward understanding and harnessing our full potential.

What's Your DiSC Type?